Popular alternatives to WP Engine
WordPress Engine is popular among bloggers, developers, and WP Engine customers when it comes to hosting. While WPE may be getting positive reviews and a fair share of challenges, it is best to look out for other alternatives that may fit your budget too. If you have already been hosted by WPE and experienced challenges such as expensive packages, then keep reading and find out other competitors that can host your WordPress site. Make sure to check The 9 Best Managed WordPress Hosting Platforms 2017 (Ranked!)
Fly wheel has attractive hosting packages the cheapest being $15 a monthly. The package allows 500 guests, has 250 GB bandwidth and storage space of up to 5 GB. Many bloggers are finding Fly Wheel as an adorable host to their WordPress sites as it offers everything needed without compromising performance.
Advantages of Fly Wheel
-It is recommended by WordPress.org
-Fly Wheel staff handles the transferring process at no extra cost.
-it’s now possible to manage all your sites from one dashboard.
-Each site you own gets a dedicated IP address.
-It is a user-friendly host
Disadvantages of Fly Wheel
-It is not a popular host as WPE.
-It limits hosting to WordPress only.
-If your site attracts high traffic than what you had paid for you get charged extra fees.
If Fly Wheel does not match your interests, then Pressidium is the WPE that you should test. The hosting company is fairly new in the market but has tremendous growth and positive remarks from its users. Pressidium has great hosting performance and uses a custom made Pinnacle Platform which offers you enterprise architecture with different hosting packages. Its plans start at $49.90 a month hosting three WordPress site and stretch to $599.90 a month to host up to 50 sites.
Advantages of Pressidium
-A simple dashboard that you can change administration settings to suit your needs.
-Transferring your website is done for free.
-It’s free to create an SFTP sub accounts.
-The pressidium staff helps you with any site challenges.
Disadvantages of Pressidium
-It does not offer any email accounts.
-Pressidium has limited payment options which are Visa, MasterCard and debit cards.
-Each hosting plan has allotted traffic limit which ranges from 1000 to one million.
Pressable has partnered with Google PageSpeed which makes it a unique and outstanding hosting service provider. Pressable markets itself as the number when it comes to customer service. The partnership with Google PageSpeed has played part in improving the site’s speed and the results are a long list of clients and positive feedback. Each of Pressable hosting plans includes free Content Delivery Network, managed updates collaborator access and SSL Certificate by Let’s Encrypt. The plan charges are from $25 a month for five and below sites to $750 a month for more than 100 sites.
Advantages of Pressable
-You get newly installed plugins as soon as a new version is released.
-You have unlimited bandwidth and storage space.
– Content Delivery Network is free for all plans.
-When having challenges, you can let a developer access your site and limit his access later using the collaborator access tool.
Disadvantages of Pressable
-Extra traffic attracts extra charges.
-Pressable can only host WordPress sites.
-It has an unattractive admin interface.
If you have had challenges with WP engine or you find it expensive, the above-managed hosting providers are the best alternatives to WP engine and worth considering.
Scale buildings have always been apart of building in modern or advanced societies. Greeks, Roman and Egyptians all made scale buildings to determine a multitude of things including scale models built on top of certain earth types to test compaction and other structural issues before building. This has the potential to show problems of course before an actual building is built. These scaled buildings even in recent architectural history have been utilized to make model tract homes to skyscrapers. The model buildings are built to certain standards like N, Piko G, S, HO and many other standards that described the way the buildings are scaled in architecture.
However, these scaled buildings are utilized for much more than their architectural value today. They have a real value in replicating landscapes like cities and neighborhoods for things like model train enthusiasts and even filmmakers. Architectural scale models must replicate every part of the intended actual building in exciting detail, and this is the same standard demanded by filmmakers and train enthusiasts in replicating towns and cities. Additionally, scale buildings are used to manage the growth in downtown areas, skylines, and to manage urban sprawl by presenting these in dimensions that can be seen readily and with problems that also present themselves in this manner. So not only the value has risen in scale buildings, the uses for these instruments have also multiplied exponentially.
There are certain things that the digital revolution has made obsolete with digital animation and other means of viewing things digitally, but scale is still a void that this revolution cannot ford. Because of this, the need for scale buildings is even more prevalent than before the advent of the internet and all of its new expansive capabilities. Additionally, someone who has elevated their craftsmanship in what many consider hobbies like train collectors and enthusiasts also require and exacting amount of detail. However, imagine replicating an actual scene in a neighborhood or even a small town in a movie. No form of media even in the digital age has been able to replace actual sets that feature scale miniature building, and in many cases, the digital forms of this media are more expensive than setting up for a scene in this manner.
In fact, some of the latest innovations in digital animation and green screen technology can still be detected in the movies or television shows, and after only a few years after the magic of viewing a movie for the first time has waned, later viewings reveal that digital media is being used instead of a scale buildings. Simply view a black and white movie with some sort of viewing technology like the 1960s version of King Kong, and it is obvious that the cinematography in the technology used to portray King Kong is obviously fake.
Understand that this movie once was seen as the standard in technology and when people viewed the film when it was new totally believed that it was real at the time. However, contrast that with the authenticity of the buildings in the movie that were never questioned. These were scale models, and their value holds even though the movie technology had advanced exponentially of over the fifty years since that King Kong movie.
Corporate Event Planning, Corporate Event Ideas and Advice